I do not need a solution (just sharing information) Hello everyone, Just done a simplified disaster recovery test. Restored system info: Windows Enterprise 2008 R2 64bit SP1, installed applications Backup Exec server 2012, installed OS roles/features: Hyper-V, MS clustering (this server is a node of a cluster). Unfortunately not all services/applications were up and running correctly after the restore. What are your conclusions after this process?
For calendar year 2019, the Spending Benchmark shall be set equivalent to the Benchmark Index submitted to the Governor and General Assembly in December 2018 as established pursuant to Executive Order Twenty-One dated June 30, 2018.
What problems have you encountered during the process and after that? Please find our remarks:. Except one thing the restore process were done smoothly. The only problem that appeared was an error after EULA acceptance that said: Process 'X: windows system32 wpeutil' reported an error executing the requested operation. The system was restored from mapped drive and the size backup was about 80GB.
The whole operation took about 50 minutes. After the restore the hyper-v and cluster services were not up and running. We were not able to run services nvspwmi (service management for hyper-v) and vmms (Hyper-v virtual machines management). System event logged 14096, 17040 (The authorization store could not be initialized: 'msxml://C: ProgramData Microsoft Virtual Machine Manager HyperVAuthStore.xml'. Error: An attempt was made to load a program with an incorrect format) and 14112. We were not able to migrate virtual machines from the main node into the restored one. The logged events 1146 and 1230.
No possibility to run scheduled backup jobs due to the incorrect authorizations: Error: a000964c, The job failed with the following error:. Backup Exec was unable to open an existing VHD because the VHD may be corrupted or because you may not have logged on as an administrator. We needed to update the backup exec agents on our servers and reconfigured the backup job for our HA (the SDR was offline) - it was enogh to deselect the selections and select them again.
In case of any further problems that will appear I try to update the remarks. Please share your expierience.
![Wpeutil Executive Order Wpeutil Executive Order](http://docplayer.net/docs-images/44/14283795/images/page_5.jpg)
![Executive Executive](/uploads/1/2/5/5/125575892/832144934.png)
I need a solution Helo everyone. Could someone explain how the exclusions difference between folder exclusion and file exclusion? What I'm confused about is the note in this article: Note: It is necessary to exclude the folders containing these files for maximum effectiveness. Folder based exclusions are processed before AutoProtect or scheduled scans access a file where file name or extension based exclusions are processed after the scan happens. Do I understand correctly that file defined in exclusion will still be scanned by autoprotect realtime or schedulled scan? So no matter I define the file, scan will still touch it on the machines and bring additional load?
I need a solution We are getting following error when we try web gui using by admin account. Version:9.5.3 HTTP Status 500 - type Exception report message description The server encountered an internal error that prevented it from fulfilling this request. Exception com.symantec.smg.controlcenter.internal.dataaccess.DataAccessException: An unexpected database error has occurred. There has been a surge or interest in the last few years to utilise tablet based or even just small form factor computers or devices. It started back when Netbooks became popular, but exploded in to the mainstream with the Apple iPad. In the last few years I've seen all sorts of people owning an iPad. Many people that either downsized from a big old desktop computer, or bought straight into iPad-land because of it's neatness and size.
Personally, I love the compactness of the iPad, and with a small bluetooth keyboard, I'm beginning to think that you could use the iPad for 'everything' computer based, except of course if you are a hard core gamer, or programmer. In this article, I'd like to discuss whether you can go 'all in' to use an iPad and still have a good end-user experience with Enterprise Vault. Screen resolution, and keyboard? I don't have a retina iPad.
Just a regular 'old' iPad2. But it really does do the job for 95% of what I want to do.
I've seen and used a retina iPad, and if I was buying now, of course, that's what I'd go for. Will I upgrade? So with an onscreen keyboard, and an iPad 2 comes the problem of a small part of the real estate (the screen) being usable/visible. It does make life tricky that's for sure. When it comes to Enterprise Vault though you'd be more or less talking about emails, and some documents.
At least, that's what I would primarily focus on - I'll leave things like SharePoint, and FSA and even Domino for a completely different day - that discussion might be long and fraught with more problems?! So, to counter the small usable real estate when you have the on-screen keyboard active, and want to do Enterprise Vault and email related actions, then really, the only solution is to go for an external keyboard. These come in varying sizes, varying 'niceness' and varying prices. I went for a Logitech Ultra Thin keyboard cover/case.
It is bluetooth, but you can slide the iPad into a groove along the top edge, and then you are sort of in laptop mode. So now I have the full screen real estate in order to handle my Enterprise Vault tasks! It's all about Safari? Up until about a year ago, iPads were all about Safari. Since then though, Google Chrome has come along, and Apple have done some work to more fully integrate it into an end-users workflow and experience, when using the iPad. But it is not Internet Explorer. We all know that Internet Explorer is THE browser that Enterprise Vault supports for things like: - Browser Search - Archive Explorer So what can you do with mobile Safari (or Google Chrome)?
The answer is not a wholelot. When you try to go to Archive Explorer on an iPad (using you get a message on the page saying: 'Archive Explorer requires Internet Explorer 6.0 or later'. Search is a little better (almost the same URL as above, but with /search.asp at the end). Integrated search, which is much simpler (searcho2k.asp) is also good this way. So where does that leave us? We can get our corporate email pretty easily, and with the merging of inboxes into the mail client, or even the usage of third party email clients, it's possible to see all of our mails. But what can we do when we see an archived item?
How can we tell it is even an archived item? Do we want iPad users to be down in Safari, or up still in the email client? There are a few policy settings that an Enterprise Vault administrator may wish to consider, if they want to be 'nice' to iPad (or other tablet device) users. These are: - Create shortcuts.
If you don't create shortcuts, and have age based policies then life is good. End-users just simply won't see any archived items in their mailbox. Even if you use Quota and Age based archiving, provided you don't archive recent items, then an end-user is still unlikely to encounter a shortcut. So careful review the archiving policy for all users, or for those that are likely to use a tablet device.
Shortcut content At the very least I would suggest including the banner to indicate that the item is archived, otherwise end-users really might not know. You could also consider using the 'full message body', rather than just the first few hundred characters. This way the archived item appears pretty much like the non-archived item. This second option does have the downside that it will not be saving much space in the mailbox, since the item is still full-size. Third Party or Wait? There is a good third party component from Commondesk called ArcViewer, which can be deployed, which gives end-users on devices like iPads (and others) an Archive Explorer-like interface. I saw this a long time ago and it is good - I liked it.
It does mean it's another third party to get in the archiving-mix, and it's something else that has to be deployed and supported. If you don't want to do that though, rumours abound about new things coming in Enterprise Vault 11, which will address this. I don't want to give out specifics, but it is likely that there will be a 'client' of sorts that can be integrated into just about any IMAP client. Conclusion So, can you go all-iPad? I think that the answer to that is yes, you can.
There are some tweaks and some issues, but largely, you can still have a good Enterprise Vault experience. You can do quite a bit of 'normal' activities with archived items, but, it would help if an administrator made some changes to Enterprise Vault.
Getting used to this now will be a good thing, because there is more 'good stuff' right around the corner in the Enterprise Vault-world. Remember it's always possible to install TeamViewer and connect to a workstation should the 'need' arise.
How do you access your archived items with an iPad or other tablet? Let me know in the comments below.
Once an organisation has been using Enterprise Vault for several years there might come a time through company acquisitions or general growth that the current Enterprise Vault environment needs to be expanded outwards. The Enterprise Vault organisation needs to grow, just like the business organisation. In this article I'll explain a few different ways in which this growth can take place. Build new - and use One way to expand is to simply build a whole new Enterprise Vault Server, with a new Vault Store, and new Vault Store Partitions and then simply start creating new archives on it. It will lead to a somewhat uneven balance, at least at the start, and it won't stop the current server still continuing to grow. Existing archives on the original server are still likely to be growing, with new email, and other data arriving daily still, and getting archived per the schedule and policies. Going for this approach does mean that nothing extra needs to be done, save perhaps for some minor work on the existing server and at the very least careful monitoring of disk space usage if the server continues to consume additional space.
The newly created archives, either for new data, or for new users, will have the full run of the new server, which will start to consume space as time goes on. So gradually over time the current save will in some ways stabilise (some people will leave, and free up space that the existing users will use some of, and new users will be commissioned on the new server) Wait - and swing upgrade Sometimes organisations are fortunate enough to be able to plan for growth and relate that to a time when they plan to upgrade too. For example upgrading from EV 9 to EV 10, or in the near future it might be when they upgrade from EV to EV 11. Doing a swing upgrade of effectively replacing the server underneath all the data means that all of the existing archives and users will get the benefit of a new, more modern, faster system.
It could also be that the storage gets expanded at the same time, or at the very least maybe new partitions are created either on existing devices or new ones, and these will then be used for the environment to grow into. With this approach you'll still be left with the one server, probably, but it'll be much newer, therefore faster. The problem that would still need to be addressed is storage, but Vault Storage partitions can effectively be created almost anywhere, they just need some level of management to keep them somewhat under control. The advantage of this approach is that you haven't expanded out the number of servers, so, you're left with only one that needs maintenance, but you also have the downside of having a single point of failure. Build new - and move As long as an organisation has kept reasonably up to date in terms of Enterprise Vault version, the IT team might be able to make use of the Move Archive feature to move some existing mailbox archives to a new server.
So like the first option a new server is built, and commissioned, with a new vault store, and vault store partitions. Perhaps new archives will be made on the new server going forward, but in addition, with this approach the IT team also use some of the built in features of Enterprise Vault and move some of the mailbox archives to the new hardware. With this approach you could go from a server which is at say 90% capacity and over a period of a few weekends where you have more 'run of the system' you might move some of that data over to the new machine and new storage, leaving say 50% on the original machine, and 40% on the new machine. Now both machines have the capability to grow - the server spec of the old machine is likely to become a problem in the medium to long term, but that's also replaceable at some point. Build new - and balance Another option which builds on the previous idea is to build new hardware and use third party software to help with the balancing of mailbox archives between the different systems. One such possibility is Archive Shuttle from QUADROtech. Its easy to use web based interface presents information relating to archives in an intuitive way.
It's quite easy to define batches of users that go through a migration. The migration happens first of all using a synchronisation approach - here data is copied from the source to the target, meaning it remains available to the users throughout the migration. The second stage is the switch, which is usually quick and painless - just a matter of minutes. A last synchronisation takes place and then a number of steps are performed to reunite the user with their target archive, which in our scenario will be on the new machine.
There are many possibilities that can be explored with Archive Shuttle, but the previous idea fulfills the immediate need we're describing here - you can in fact use something Archive Shuttle to help with migration to the cloud as well. Working through a balancing process like this can mean that the introduction of new hardware can be a quick and painless affair, and during the whole process users maintain access to their archived data and that's a big benefit. It is also pretty easy to administer with a low overhead in terms of system requirements and load on the systems which are in place. Sharing Some of the ideas presented here are of course dependent on the sharing level within Enterprise Vault. If a new vault store is created, in the same vault store group where sharing is configured across the group, then any movement of email archive data isn't going to have an effect on the actual data stored down on the vault store partitions.
If sharing is configured in this way, and it is a good thing to do, it might be that you would need to create a new vault store group, and a new vault store within that group. You'd have to do that to realise some of the benefits of moving archives 'off' a main server on to a new server, otherwise the new servers archives end up just having references back to the data on the old server.
Summary Growth is what everyone hopes for their business, but with it comes some costs, and eventually that cost spreads to things like infrastructure upgrades. We've seen here how a perfectly well designed Enterprise Vault environment may require some growth, and some attention over the space of a few years. How has your Enterprise Vault environment grown?
Let me know in the comments below. I need a solution Hi Everyone, I need some help to fix my netbackup media server STU not reclaiming space. Netbackup Setup: OS: Microsoft Windows 2008 R2 Netbackup Version: 7.1.0.4 Netbackup Master: 1 Netbackup Media Server (Tape / Puredisk): 6 We are having problem with 1 of our puredisk media server.
Based on Disk Pool Status, Storage Pool is 99.89% Full. However upon checking the Disk Reports Images on Disk.
Selecting concerned Storage STU to list all images, it shows no result or any images stored in it. Hope anyone can help me to fix our issue. We need the Storage Unit to be avaiable again for backup. I need a solution During a Full Exchange 2010 GRT backup on the passive node in a DAG, the Microsoft Exchange Replica Writer went into a 'Retryable Error' state causing the status 130. We will address this issue with MS to fix that problem.
What I could use assistance with from the Symantec forum is the following: 1. What NBU log files on the passive node do I need to setup in order to capture why the backup is failing? Right now I have bpfis created on the Exchange 2010 passive client (where the passive database is located and where the backup is performed) 2. Why would our nightly Full Non-GRT still complete successfully without any errors as opposed to the GRT? Environment: NetBackup 7.5.0.6 (Master, Media and all Exchange clients) Windows 2008 R2 SP1 Enterprise x64 Exchange 2010 SP3 Thanks for your assistance.
I need a solution Environment Details: Master Server: AIX 6.1, NetBackup 7.5.0.5 Client: Windows 2008 R2, Clustered, NetBackup 7.5.0.5 Issue: Backup of DFSR data from Windows 2008 R2 client failed with error 69. 'Unable to backup System State or Shadow Copy. Please check the state of VSS and associated Writers.INF - EXIT STATUS 69: invalid filelist specification' ' vssadmin list writers' from client report all writers as 'Stable' and 'No Error'. No application events related to VSS on Cleint Logs from Client report that.